M.A.
United States v. M.A.
Opinion
Opinion
5 F.3d 542 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. M.A., Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10737. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 11, 1993. * Decided Aug. 19, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; No. CR-92-007288-JMR, John M. Roll, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. AFFIRMED. Before: KOZINSKI, THOMPSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 M.A. was found guilty of juvenile delinquency. See 18 U.S.C. Sec. 5031 . The underlying offenses were possession and conspiracy with intent to distribute cocaine. 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1), 846. 3 A. M.A. first challenges the admission into evidence of a declaration made by Willie Jones, a local resident and county deputy sheriff, to a pursuing officer. Deputy Jones had just seen a man run past his house; minutes later police officers in full pursuit came by. Recognizing the value of his information,…