United States v. Douglas Keith Lilly

5 F.3d 542 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Douglas Keith LILLY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50108. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1993. * Decided Sept. 2, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Southern District of California, D.C. No. CR-89-00298-RMB; Rudi M. Brewster, District Judge, Presiding. S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Douglas Keith Lilly appeals the 21-month sentence imposed under the United States Sentencing Guidelines following the revocation of his term of supervised release. Lilly contends the district court's imposition of a sentence at the high end of the applicable Guidelines range in order to provide a longer term of mental health treatment at the Bureau of Prison's hospital in Springfield, Missouri, where Lilly had requested he be incarcerated, violated his right to due…