United States v. Jose Regulo Miranda-Encinas, A.K.A. Roberto Arrizon-Pena

5 F.3d 542 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Regulo MIRANDA-ENCINAS, a.k.a. Roberto Arrizon-Pena, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10567. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 11, 1993. * Decided Aug. 25, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; No. CR-92-00067-JMR, John M. Roll, District Judge, Presiding D.Ariz. AFFIRMED. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jose Regulo Miranda-Encinas appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, for conspiracy to import, importation of, conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute, and possession with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1), 846, 952(a), 963. Miranda-Encinas contends (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions and (2) he was denied a fair trial because the government elicited improper testimony during…