United States v. Jaime Navarro-Leon, United States of America v. Santana Navarro-Rivera

5 F.3d 542 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaime NAVARRO-LEON, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Santana NAVARRO-RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-50226, 92-50433. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 31, 1993. Decided Sept. 22, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Central District of California, D.C. Nos. CR-91-0922-JMI-1, CR-91-0922-JMI-2; James M. Ideman, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI and BOGGS, * Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** A. Navarro-Leon The district court's finding that defendant committed perjury was not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Arias-Villanueva, slip op. 7581, 7614-15 (9th Cir. July 20, 1993). The court was not required to make findings as to specific portions of the defendant's testimony it believed to be false, id.; it is enough that it found…