United States v. Wayne D. Moffatt

5 F.3d 542 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wayne D. MOFFATT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10038. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 11, 1993. * Decided Aug. 26, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; No. CR-92-05119-EDP, Edward D. Price, District Judge, Presiding. E.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before PREGERSON, BRUNETTI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Wayne D. Moffatt appeals his conviction after a guilty plea to bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a). Moffatt contends the district court erred by denying his motion to continue the trial date based upon his discomfort with appointed counsel. Moffatt also argues his guilty plea was not knowing and voluntary due to his medical condition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 * Continuance 4 Moffatt contends the district court committed reversible…