United States v. Paul Kloeppel, United States of America v. Alan Andre La Police

5 F.3d 542 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul KLOEPPEL, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alan Andre LA POLICE, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-10427, 92-10416. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 16, 1993. Decided Aug. 18, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; No. CR-91-00136-EHC, Earl H. Carroll, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. AFFIRMED. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, and D.W. NELSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Kloeppel and LaPolice appeal from their convictions of conspiracy and wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. Secs. 371 , 1342, 1343. The district court had jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3231 . We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 2 Kloeppel and LaPolice each argue that the court abused its discretion by denying their motions…