United States v. Arcadio Nunez, United States of America v. Librado Nunez, United States of America v. Paz Nunez

Good Law
5 F.3d 543·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30856
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 7, 199392-10131California2,606 words

Opinion

Opinion

5 F.3d 543 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Arcadio NUNEZ, Defendant/Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Librado NUNEZ, Defendant/Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Paz NUNEZ, Defendant/Appellant. Nos. 92-10131, 92-10132 and 92-10133. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 17, 1993. * Decided Sept. 7, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; No. CR-F-91-070-MDC, M.D. Crocker, Senior District Judge Presiding. E.D.Cal. AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED. 1 Before: NORRIS and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 All three defendants appeal following their convictions for cultivating marijuana and conspiracy. We affirm as to Librado Nunez and Arcadio Nunez, but reverse and remand as to Paz Nunez. A. LIBRADO NUNEZ 4 Appellant Librado Nunez was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.