United States v. Jerrald Albert Tyler

5 F.3d 543 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerrald Albert TYLER Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50165. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 7, 1993. * Decided Sept. 22, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Central District of California, D.C. No. CR-91-0828-DT-2; Dickran M. Tevrizian, Jr., District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: KOZINSKI, SILER ** and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Defendant Tyler was convicted on sixteen counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1341 , involving the purchase and operation of car washes through Syndicorp, Inc. Defendant primarily raises the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel at trial and other errors by the court which were not developed by defense counsel at trial. 3 Defendant asserts that his counsel failed to develop a tacit agreement by the United States not to prosecute a material…