United States v. Jason Rooney

5 F.3d 543 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jason ROONEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10677. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 11, 1993. * Decided Aug. 19, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; No. CR-92-00214-RHS, Robert H. Schnacke, Senior District Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: KOZINSKI, THOMPSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rooney appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute and conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1), 846. 3 A. Rooney claims the district court failed to make findings of fact on the record in denying his motion to suppress. Such findings are necessary, however, only "[w]here factual issues are involved in determining a motion." Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(e). Because Rooney failed to raise a dispute as to any of the facts involved in the…