United States v. Jaspal Singh

5 F.3d 543 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaspal SINGH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10638. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 31, 1993. Decided Sept. 8, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, D.C. No. CR-90-20129-JW; James Ware, District Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: REAVLEY, * PREGERSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Defendant Jaspal Singh was indicted in eight counts of bribery of a public official, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 201 (b)(1)(c). Singh was arrested as part of a bribery investigation conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") at the Salinas Immigration and Naturalization Service ("INS") office. Ishmael Ikharo was also indicted for bribery of a public official as part of the same investigation. Before trial, Ikharo filed a motion to dismiss for outrageous…