United States v. Hyun Bae Suh

5 F.3d 543 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hyun Bae SUH, Defendant-Appellant No. 92-50187. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 11, 1993. * Decided Aug. 26, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CR-91-869-RG, Richard A. Gadbois, Jr., District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before PREGERSON, BRUNETTI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Before PREGERSON, BRUNETTI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 Hyun Bae Suh appeals his sentence of 16 months incarceration imposed under the Sentencing Guidelines after he pleaded guilty to one count of producing false identification documents in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1028 (a)(1). He argues that the district court erred by increasing his base offense level for "more than minimal planning," according to U.S.S.G. Sec. 2F1.1(b)(2)(A), and by departing upward based on the number of documents…