United States v. Michael Paul Tabares

5 F.3d 543 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Paul TABARES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-55545. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1993. * Decided Sept. 2, 1993. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael Tabares, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to vacate his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to four counts of unarmed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 2255. We review de novo, United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1990), and affirm. 3 Tabares appears to contend that the prosecutor's failure to disclose evidence of charges pending against Tabares in the Eastern District of California, was a violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), because these charges could have been subject to…