United States v. Rodimiro Rojas-Oquita

5 F.3d 543 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodimiro ROJAS-OQUITA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10348. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 13, 1993. Decided Aug. 25, 1993. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; No. CR-88-00329-01-AC, Alfredo C. Marquez, District Judge, Presiding. 2 D.Ariz., 940 F.2d 1247 . 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before: POOLE, FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and KELLEHER, Senior District Judge * 5 MEMORANDUM ** 6 Rodimiro Rojas-Oquita appeals the district court's denial of his motion for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33. Rojas-Oquita had been convicted of 14 counts of various drug related offenses. 1 Rojas-Oquita claims that following his trial it was disclosed, during an unrelated federal drug case, 2 that John Becerra, the confidential informant who had testified against him, had been arrested by state police…