United States v. Rodney J. Quigley

5 F.3d 543 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodney J. QUIGLEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-55105. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 1, 1993. * Decided Sept. 13, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CV-92-01175-MRP(V); Mariana R. Pfaelzer, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: FLETCHER, POOLE, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rodney J. Quigley appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the United States in the government's action to recover on a defaulted Veterans Administration ("VA") guaranteed home loan. Quigley also appeals the district court's denial of his (1) motion to dismiss, (2) motion for summary judgment, (3) motion for "consent summary judgment", and (4) motion for a stay of the judgment pending appeal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 .…