United States v. Tirso Robles

5 F.3d 543 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tirso ROBLES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10225. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 9, 1993. Decided Sept. 27, 1993. As Amended Dec. 3, 1993. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Robert E. Coyle, District Judge, Presiding. 2 E.D.Cal. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before: REINHARDT and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and MERHIGE, Senior District Judge. * 5 MEMORANDUM ** 6 On October 8, 1991 a jury convicted appellant of six counts stemming from his alleged involvement in a large-scale marijuana trafficking enterprise: continuing criminal enterprise ( 21 U.S.C. Sec. 848 ); conspiracy to possess a controlled substance with intent to distribute ( 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1), 846); and possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, aiding and abetting ( 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1), 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2…