United States v. Jose Antonio Pons

5 F.3d 543 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Antonio PONS, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-10033, 92-10262. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 8, 1993. * Decided Sept. 27, 1993. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, No. CR-88-0749-JPV; Samuel Conti, District Judge, Presiding. 2 N.D.Cal. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before: PREGERSON, BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and TAKASUGI, District Judge. ** 5 MEMORANDUM *** 6 Jose Antonio Pons appeals from the district court's denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his motion for new trial based upon newly discovered evidence and the denial of his post-trial request for discovery. We have jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm the district court's order denying the motion for new trial based upon newly discovered evidence and the district court's order denying Pons' post-trial…