United States v. Richard Andrew Simpson

5 F.3d 543 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard Andrew SIMPSON, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-10499. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 10, 1993. * Decided Sept. 8, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, DC No. CR-86-00089-EDP; Edward D. Price, District Judge, Presiding. E.D.Cal., 919 F.2d 147 . AFFIRMED. Before: POOLE, BOOCHEVER, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 On November 19, 1990, this court reversed on certain grounds Simpson's convictions for violation of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. 1361 et al., and vacated and remanded certain other counts previously dismissed by the district court "because 'the district court failed to set out the relevant findings to clearly articulate its application of the (Speedy Trial Act) statutory factors to the facts of the case.' United States v. White, 864 F.2d 660, 667 (9th…