United States v. Michael D. Pirello, United States of America v. Michael D. Pirello
Opinion
Opinion
5 F.3d 543 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael D. PIRELLO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael D. PIRELLO, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-30072, 93-30073. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1993. * Decided Sept. 3, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Nos. CR-88-00403-S, CR-92-00132-WFN; Wm. Fremming Nielsen, District Judge, Presiding. E.D.Wash. AFFIRMED. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these consolidated appeals, Michael Pirello appeals his sentence imposed following guilty pleas to two counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g)(1). Pirello contends the district court erroneously calculated his base offense level under the Guidelines because neither his prior Idaho state conviction for first…