United States v. Steven Mark White

5 F.3d 544 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Steven Mark WHITE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30106. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 7, 1993. * Decided Aug. 19, 1993. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; No. CR-91-60141-1, Michael R. Hogan, District Judge, Presiding. 2 D.Or. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before PREGERSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, and INGRAM, ** Senior District Judge. 5 MEMORANDUM *** 6 Steven Mark White appeals from the denial of his motion to suppress evidence and from the two level enhancement of his sentence for possession of a firearm. We affirm. 7 Following his indictment on a single count of manufacturing marijuana under 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 , White filed a motion to suppress the evidence found in a search of his home, alleging that the affidavit offered in support of the search warrant contained material misstatements and falsehoods…