Watts v. United States
Opinion
Opinion
5 F.3d 544 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Susan WATTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United States; Ruth Ann Myers, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-15422. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 9, 1993. Decided Sept. 22, 1993. Before: SNEED, POOLE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant Susan Watts appeals from the district court's order denying her motion for attorneys' fees and costs in her action against the Immigration and Naturalization Service ("INS"). Watts, a citizen of Great Britain, had requested certain documents from the INS pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") in connection with proceedings to deny her application for Waiver of Requirement to file Joint Petition for Removal of Conditions via form I-752, pursuant to Sec. 216(c)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality…