Arthur G. Williams, Jr. v. Pima County Board of Supervisors

5 F.3d 544 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Arthur G. WILLIAMS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PIMA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15663. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1993. * Decided Sept. 1, 1993. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arthur G. Williams, Jr. appeals pro se the district court's judgment, following bench trial, in favor of defendants Pima County Board of Supervisors, et al. ("Pima County"), in his race and gender discrimination action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq. Williams contends that the district court erred by denying his discovery motions, striking witnesses from his witness list, and admitting certain evidence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Discovery Motions 4 Williams contends that the district court erred by-denying his discovery requests for…