United States v. Gerald Martin Walsh, United States of America v. Jiles Byron Gray

5 F.3d 544 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerald Martin WALSH, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jiles Byron GRAY, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-50003, 92-50209. * United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 6, 1993. Decided Aug. 25, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Nos. CR-90-0687-JGD, No. CR-90-0687-JGD, John G. Davies, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: NOONAN, FERNANDEZ, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges MEMORANDUM ** Gerald Walsh appeals his jury conviction and sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines for conspiracy to transport and possess stolen goods in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 371 , interstate transportation of stolen goods in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2314 , possession of stolen goods in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2315 , and conspiracy to obstruct or delay…