Angela S. Weems v. Vincent Nguyen

Good Law
5 F.3d 544·1993 WL 321384·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30722
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 20, 199392-16884California350 words

Opinion

Opinion

5 F.3d 544 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Angela S. WEEMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Vincent NGUYEN, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16884. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 11, 1993. * Decided Aug. 20, 1993. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Angela S. Weems appeals pro se the district court's judgment, following a jury trial, in favor of Vincent Nguyen in Weems' action alleging violations of the Fair Housing Act ("Act"), 42 U.S.C. Sec. 601 , et seq. Weems alleged that Nguyen, the manager of the apartment complex in which Weems resided, violated the Act by failing to abate certain loud noises originating from neighboring apartments. We dismiss the appeal. 3 In her opening brief, Weems restates the claims in her complaint before the district court and challenges the jury verdict in favor of Nguyen on those claims. Weems has failed, however, to supply this court with the trial transcript. If an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.