Sheila Wainscott v. United States of America

5 F.3d 544 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sheila WAINSCOTT, et al., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55868. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1993. * Decided Aug. 25, 1993. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Sheila Wainscott 1 appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of her civil rights action against the United States and various bankruptcy court personnel as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review the district court's dismissal of an action under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d) for an abuse of discretion, see Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 1730-31 (1992), and we affirm. 3 In her complaint, Wainscott made vague and conclusory allegations against the bankruptcy trustee and the clerk of the bankruptcy court. For instance, she claimed that they intentionally mislead…