Del Ackels v. United States Environmental Protection Agency William K. Reilly

Good Law
7 F.3d 862·93 Daily Journal DAR 13008·24 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20032·37 ERC (BNA) 2118·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26667
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 14, 199392-70239California3,432 words

Opinion

Opinion

Schroeder, J.

INTRODUCTION

Petitioners Del Aekels, Stanley C. Ryba-chek, Rosalie A. Rybachek, Glenn Bouton, Donald Stein, Lela Bouton, and Richard Ger-aghty, are individual miners who have engaged in gold placer mining in Alaska. They filed this petition pro se asking us to review permits issued to them by the Environmental Protection Agency. The permits are National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits issued under the authority of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1387 , pursuant to the regulatory framework established by the EPA. The permits impose effluent limitations, including numerical limits for specific pollutants in the discharge, and require specific technological practices miners must follow.

This court first considered NPDES permits for placer miners in Trustees for Alaska v. EPA, 749 F.2d 549 (9th Cir.1984). The opinion in that case described the sluicing process used to remove gold from “placers,” which are alluvial or glacial deposits containing gold particles. This sluicing process results in the discharge of waste water which, if untreated, can create a serious environmental hazard to wildlife, particularly in the case of larger placer mining…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.