Flintkote Company v. United States

Caution
7 F.3d 870·93 Daily Journal DAR 13130·1993 WL 409741·72 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6388·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26838
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 18, 199391-16618California2,833 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hall, J.

The Flintkote Company (“Flintkote”) appeals from the district court’s judgment in favor of the government following cross-motions for summary judgment in this action for refund of federal income taxes plus interest paid by Flintkote for the years 1970-73. Flintkote contests the Internal Revenue Service’s (“IRS”) partial disallowance of Flint-kote’s deduction of $3.5 million paid to settle a large number of civil antitrust treble damage actions. The parties to this action dispute whether, within the meaning of 26 U.S.C. § 162 (g), the civil suits involved the same violation as was charged in a subsequent criminal indictment against Flintkote.

The district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (a)(1), and this court has jurisdiction of this timely appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm.

I.

In 1973, Flintkote agreed to settle a large number of civil antitrust treble damage actions brought in the late 1960s against it and other manufacturers of gypsum wallboard. Flintkote paid $3.5 million as its share of the settlement payment, and then deducted that amount from its federal income taxes as a business expense. Relying on 26 U.S.C. § 162 (g), the IRS disallowed $…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.