Umesh Charan v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

8 F.3d 25 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Umesh CHARAN, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70314. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 4, 1993. * Decided Oct. 13, 1993. Before: HUG, FARRIS, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Umesh Charan petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying as a matter of discretion Charan's application for a waiver of deportation under section 212(c). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a). We review for an abuse of discretion, Ayala-Chavez v. INS, 944 F.2d 638, 642 (9th Cir.1991), and deny the petition for review. 3 "In reviewing a BIA decision for abuse of discretion, we require that its stated reasons evidence its consideration of all relevant factors." Mattis v. INS, 774 F.2d 965, 967 (9th Cir.1985). We will reverse only if the BIA's decision "fails to support its conclusions with a reasoned…