Andersen v. United States

8 F.3d 25 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ronald M. ANDERSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, an agency of the United States of America, Clarence Thomas, Richard R. Trujillo; Richard L. Green, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16592. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 9, 1993. Decided Oct. 5, 1993. Before: FLETCHER, POOLE, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Ronald Andersen, former senior trial attorney with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"), appeals the district court's dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of his action seeking reinstatement. The district court held that the Civil Service Reform Act ("CSRA" or "Act"), 5 U.S.C. § 2302 , precludes judicial review. Andersen contends that the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA"), 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq., confers jurisdiction on the district court or, alternatively, that it has…