Broadnax v. Municipal Court, County of Los Angeles

Good Law
8 F.3d 25·1993 WL 402947·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 34169
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 7, 199392-55619California1,222 words

Opinion

Opinion

8 F.3d 25 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lawrence BROADNAX; Frank Juan Rivera; Milos Klvana, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MUNICIPAL COURT, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, in its official capacity as a County Judicial Agency; Ira Reiner, District Attorney, in his official capacity as District Attorney of Los Angeles County; Wilbur F. Littlefield, Public Defender, in his official capacity as the Public Defender of Los Angeles County, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55619. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 20, 1993. * Decided Oct. 7, 1993. Before: FLETCHER, POOLE, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lawrence Broadnax, Frank Juan Rivera and Milos Klvana, California state prisoners, appeal pro se and in forma pauperis the district court's entry of summary judgment for the defendants in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 3 Plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.