Chris Charles Chambers v. Nevada Adult Probation Department

8 F.3d 25 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Chris Charles CHAMBERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEVADA ADULT PROBATION DEPARTMENT, et al., Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-16869. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 20, 1993. * Decided Oct. 1, 1993. Before: FLETCHER, POOLE, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Chris Chambers, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus. Chambers contends that he is entitled to an immediate hearing on a probation violation warrant issued by the State of Nevada. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 . We review de novo, Thomas v. Lewis, 945 F.2d 1119, 1122 (9th Cir.1991), and affirm. 3 Chambers was arrested, convicted, and imprisoned in Arizona for a crime committed on April 14, 1988, while he was on probation from the State of Nevada. Consequently, the State of Nevada Department of Parole and…