Samuel Thomas Carroll v. Roger W. Crist, Warden Attorney General of the State of Arizona

8 F.3d 25 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Samuel Thomas CARROLL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Roger W. CRIST, Warden; Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16028. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 6, 1993. * Decided Oct. 21, 1993. Before BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Samuel Thomas Carroll, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. Following a jury trial, he was convicted of aggravated assault, kidnapping, and armed robbery and sentenced to 36 years imprisonment. Carroll contends that (1) the trial court denied him a fair trial by admitting the victim's in-court identification of him; (2) the trial court denied him a fair trial by failing properly to control the jury's viewing of his car and by admitting the victim's identification of the car; and (3) an instruction pursuant to Allen v. United States,…