Clark v. Coye

Good Law
8 F.3d 26·1993 WL 394846·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 34185
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 5, 199392-16852California663 words

Opinion

Opinion

8 F.3d 26 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Virginia CLARK; Marie Evers; Susan Ray; Anastasia Preciado; George Frazier; Evelyn Carlin; Solange Soja, by her guardian ad litem Susette Soja; Sobrique Soja, by her guardian ad litem Susette Soja; Carol Charney, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Molly Joel COYE, M.D., M.P.H., Director, State Department of Health Services, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-16852. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 30, 1993. Decided Oct. 5, 1993. Before: REINHARDT and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, * District Judge MEMORANDUM ** On June 23, 1992, we affirmed the district court's judgment of liability, and remanded on the issue of the appropriate injunctive remedy for the state of California's violation of the federal Medicaid access-to-care provision. On remand, the magistrate judge entered a permanent injunction requiring Denti-Cal provider…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.