Edgar Fuller v. United States

8 F.3d 26 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edgar FULLER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-56307. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 20, 1993. * Decided Oct. 1, 1993. Before: FLETCHER, POOLE, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Edgar Fuller, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. Fuller contends that (1) he was seized without probable cause in violation of his fourth amendment rights; (2) he was wrongly convicted of distributing cocaine base; and (3) his counsel was ineffective. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . We review de novo, United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1990), and affirm. 3 An undercover narcotics investigation led to the discovery of a "rock house" at an apartment complex in Long Beach. On two occasions, March 5 and…