Garcia v. Pugh

Good Law
8 F.3d 26·1993 WL 362268·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 34159
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 199392-36897California1,110 words

Opinion

Opinion

8 F.3d 26 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Anthony S. GARCIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. PUGH, Regional Director of the Department of Corrections-Southeast; Dan W. Carothers, Superintendent, Lemon Creek Correctional Center; and Norm Anderson, Sergeant at Lemon Creek Correctional Center, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-36897. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 3, 1993. * Decided Sept. 17, 1993. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Anthony S. Garcia (Garcia), an Alaska state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment and denying his cross-motion for summary judgment in this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . We review de novo, Darring v. Kincheloe, 783 F.2d 874, 876 (9th Cir.1986), and we AFFIRM. 3 Garcia alleges he was denied due process during classification hearings conducted at Lemon Creek Correctional Center (LCCC) where he was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.