Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. Norman J. Mavencamp, and United States of America, Acting Through the Farmers Home Administration Joseph Mavencamp

8 F.3d 26 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. FARM CREDIT BANK OF SPOKANE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Norman J. MAVENCAMP, Defendant-Appellant, and United States of America, acting through the Farmers Home Administration; Joseph Mavencamp, Defendants. No. 91-36239. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 5, 1993. * Decided Oct. 20, 1993. Before: BEEZER and HALL, Circuit Judges, and ARMSTRONG, ** District Judge. MEMORANDUM *** Norman Mavencamp appeals the district court's summary judgment of foreclosure in favor of Farm Credit Bank of Spokane. Mavencamp primarily argues the Bank was required to accept his survey as accurate before denying his loan-restructuring proposal. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. * By May 1989, Mavencamp had defaulted on the mortgage securing his farm land. Pursuant to the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987, the Bank, as mortgage holder, gave Mavencamp the opportunity to restructure the…