Frank Boring Fitzgerald v. Montana Department of Family Services
Opinion
Opinion
8 F.3d 26 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frank Boring FITZGERALD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-35001. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 6, 1993. * Decided Aug. 30, 1993. 1 Before BEEZER and HALL, Circuit Judges, and CONTI, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Frank Boring Fitzgerald appeals pro se from the district court's dismissal and summary judgment order against him in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Fitzgerald alleged that various employees of the Montana Department of Family Services and others violated his right to maintain relations with his daughter. The district court dismissed Fitzgerald's claims against the agencies and employees of the state of Montana under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the remaining defendants. We affirm. 4 * Margaret Moore was born in 1972 to Jewel Moore. The Montana…