Robert D. Gibson v. James Rowland, Director

Good Law
8 F.3d 26
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 24, 199392-55447California1,286 words

Opinion

Opinion

8 F.3d 26 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert D. GIBSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James ROWLAND, Director, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-55447. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1993. * Aug. 11, 1993. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Aug. 24, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. AMENDED ORDER 1 The order issued August 11, 1993 is amended as follows: 2 The memorandum disposition issued March 16, 1993 in this matter is vacated. The attached memorandum disposition is hereby ordered filed. 3 The panel has voted to deny appellant's petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. 4 The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed.R.App.P. 35. 5 The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected. 6…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.