Abdul Ganny Jaji v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
8 F.3d 27·1993 WL 409146·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 34514
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 12, 199392-70207California532 words

Opinion

Opinion

8 F.3d 27 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Abdul Ganny JAJI, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70207. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1993. Decided Oct. 12, 1993. Before: HUG, FARRIS, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Abdul Ganny Jaji requests review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying suspension of deportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1254 . We affirm. 3 * Mr. Jaji contends that the BIA abused its discretion in denying his application for suspension of deportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (a) on the ground that he failed to establish the element of extreme hardship. 4 "The BIA may construe extreme hardship narrowly. When it denies suspension of deportation, it must give reasons showing that it has considered all relevant factors." Batoon v. INS, 707 F.2d 399, 401 (9th Cir.1983) (citations omitted). In determining whether an alien with a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.