Rickey Hammond v. Gail Lewis, Warden, and Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General of the State of California

8 F.3d 27 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rickey HAMMOND, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gail LEWIS, Warden, and Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-55142. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 5, 1993. * Decided Oct. 21, 1993. Before: SKOPIL, HALL, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rickey Hammond appeals the district court's denial of his habeas petition. He claims that (1) he was denied a fair opportunity to present his fourth amendment claims in state court; (2) there was insufficient evidence to support his convictions; (3) the trial court erred in admitting other crimes evidence; (4) pretrial identification procedures were unduly suggestive; (5) certain statements by the prosecutor were improper; and (6) the cumulative effect of these errors deprived him of his constitutional right to a fair trial. We affirm. 1. Fourth Amendment 3 In Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465,…