Saragosa Jimenez v. United States

Good Law
8 F.3d 27·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 34509
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 1, 199393-35089California915 words

Opinion

Opinion

8 F.3d 27 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Saragosa JIMENEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. Nos. 93-35089, 93-35090. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 2, 1993. Decided Oct. 1, 1993. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant Saragosa Jimenez was charged with two counts of drug-related crimes in a multi-defendant, multi-count superseding indictment in February, 1988. On April 20, 1989, he pleaded guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute less than a gram of cocaine, and in November of that year he was accordingly sentenced to twelve years in prison and three years of special parole. That sentence was later reduced to eight years in prison, with the three years of special parole commuted to three years of supervised release. 3 In the first of these two appeals, Jimenez challenges the district court's summary denial of his 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.