Martin v. County of Stanislaus

8 F.3d 28 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frank H. MARTIN; Joanne D. Martin, individually and as Guardian ad Litem for their minor sons, Thomas F. Martin, a minor, David J. Martin, a minor, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, Gayle Bondy, Richard Allen, Lloyd Solomon, and William Howard (Child Protective Service Workers), Stanislaus County Sheriff's Deputies David Rasmussen, John Mitchell, Richard Rhodes, and Charles Beidleman and Sgt. Norman Henderson, Defendants-Appellants. No. 92-16395. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 14, 1993. Decided Sept. 30, 1993. 1 Before: POOLE, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and KELLEHER, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 The County of Stanislaus, county social workers, and county sheriffs appeal the district court's denial of their summary judgment motion asserting absolute and qualified immunity from suit as to the federal civil rights and pendant state tort claims raised in…