Frank McDowell v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General, of USPS

Good Law
8 F.3d 28·1993 WL 362220·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 34434
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 199393-15156California1,078 words

Opinion

Opinion

8 F.3d 28 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frank McDOWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony M. FRANK, Postmaster General, of USPS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15156. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 3, 1993. * Decided Sept. 17, 1993. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frank McDowell appeals pro se from the district court's entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendant in this Title VII employment discrimination action, arguing that the district court erred by entering summary judgment without granting McDowell leave to amend his complaint. We reject these contentions and affirm. FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS 3 McDowell was suspended from his job as a postal employee following his arrest on felony drug charges. The United States Postal Service later reinstated McDowell with back pay after a jury acquitted him of those charges. McDowell then filed the instant pro se Title VII employment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.