Gerald B. Netzky v. State Bar of Nevada

8 F.3d 28 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gerald B. NETZKY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE BAR OF NEVADA, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15115. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 12, 1993. Decided Oct. 19, 1993. MEMORANDUM * Before: POOLE, FERGUSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 Appellant Gerald B. Netzky appeals the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Netzky argues that the district court erred in dismissing his action because the Nevada Supreme Court Rules governing the denial of bar applicants based on moral character and the appeal of such denial, on their face and as applied, violate his right to due process and equal protection. We vacate the judgment of the district court and remand with instructions to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. I. 2 Netzky's complaint presents the following allegations: 3 Netzky and his wife moved to Las Vegas, Nevada in 1989. Netzky had…