McNamara v. Edwards

8 F.3d 28 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Cathileen MCNAMARA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Todd EDWARDS, California Hardwear, California Athletic Designs, Inc., Brent Edwards, Doug Neilsson, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, a legal partnership, and DOES 1 through 25, Defendants- Appellees. No. 92-15837. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 6, 1993. Decided Oct. 15, 1993. Before: HUG, FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 The district court dismissed with prejudice McNamara's complaint against Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher for failure to state a claim. The court also dismissed McNamara's claim against Doug Neilsson but permitted her thirty days to amend the complaint. After thirty days passed and McNamara failed to file an amended complaint, Neilsson moved to dismiss for failure to prosecute and the court granted his motion. McNamara appeals. 3 We affirm. 4 McNamara asserts that the district court did not have…