Anthony Dewayne Mitchell v. Clarence Dupnik D.E. Robare M.S. Garland

8 F.3d 28 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Anthony Dewayne MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence DUPNIK; D.E. Robare; M.S. Garland, Defendants-Appellants. No. 92-15722. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 20, 1993. * Decided Oct. 18, 1993. Before: FLETCHER, POOLE, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik and other officers of the Pima County Sheriff's Department appeal the district court's order finding the Pima County Adult Detention Center ("PCADC") law library inadequate and directing defendants to provide appellee Anthony Dewayne Mitchell access to the Modern Federal Practice Digest published by West Publishing Company. We dismiss this appeal as moot. 3 In general, a case becomes moot when "the issues are no longer live or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome." Sample v. Johnson, 771 F.2d 1335, 1338 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1019 (1986). We…