Richard Thomas Moore v. Robert G. Borg

8 F.3d 28 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard Thomas MOORE, Petitioner-appellant, v. Robert G. BORG, Respondent-appellee. No. 92-17037. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 13, 1993. * Decided Sept. 16, 1993. 1 Before: REINHARDT and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and MERHIGE, Senior District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Appellant Richard Thomas Moore, proceeding pro se, appeals the lower court's final order of October 13, 1992, denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . The appeal is made pursuant to the district court's issuance on November 24, 1992 of a certificate of probable cause to appeal. 4 On appeal Moore first asserts that the district court erred in not finding that he was entitled to new counsel in presenting his new trial motion due to alleged ineffectiveness on the part of his counsel. Further, Moore argues that the district court erred in not finding that his counsel's representation was…