Emilia Navarro v. Social Security Administration

8 F.3d 28 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Emilia NAVARRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 92-16835, 92-17002. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 20, 1993. * Decided Oct. 6, 1993. Before: FLETCHER, POOLE and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these consolidated cases, Emilia Navarro appeals pro se the district court's judgment for the Social Security Administration in her action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 405 (h) to obtain copies of allegedly stolen benefits' checks issued to her. Navarro contends that the district court erred by (1) dismissing her action based upon failure to exhaust administrative remedies and (2) denying her petition for production of transcripts regarding all hearings in her case at government expense. The government contends that Navarro untimely filed a notice of appeal from the court's order dismissing her action, and therefore we…