Mines v. Gardner

8 F.3d 28 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kenneth MINES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Booth GARDNER, Governor; Amos Reed; Kurt Peterson, Superintendent; Conrado Marapo, Employee of the Washington State Department of Corrections; Larry Kincheloe, Superintendent, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-36580. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 20, 1993. * Decided Sept. 29, 1993. Before: FLETCHER, POOLE, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kenneth Mines, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the order granting summary judgment for defendants and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Mines claims that his constitutional rights were violated when he was subjected to a digital rectal probe search when he was transferred into the Intensive Management Unit ("IMU") at the Washington Corrections Center ("WCC"). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the grant of…