Lexington Insurance Company v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company

8 F.3d 28 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, No. 92-55275. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 10, 1993. Decided Oct. 5, 1993. Before: FLETCHER, POOLE and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 In this declaratory judgment action, Hartford Fire Insurance Company ("Hartford") appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Lexington Insurance Company ("Lexington"). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY 3 This coverage dispute arises out of injuries sustained by James Randall when a truck in which he was a passenger struck a steam riser on the premises of Shell Western Exploration & Production, Inc. ("Shell"), causing the release of superheated steam. Randall and the driver were employees of Coastal Engineering Co. ("Coastal") and…