Eduardo Pacumio Nenita Pacumio, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Vincent Sereno, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, Roger Hogan, Joel Bibby, Fred Paige

8 F.3d 29 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Eduardo PACUMIO; Nenita Pacumio, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. Vincent SERENO, et al., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, Roger HOGAN, Joel Bibby, Fred Paige, Cross-Appellees. Nos. 92-15287, 92-15290. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 12, 1993. Decided Oct. 5, 1993. Before: POOLE, FERGUSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Vincent Sereno, a park ranger for the Merced Irrigation District (MID), appeals the jury's verdict in favor of Jaime Nievera on Nievera's claim that Sereno violated his first amendment rights by filing a report claiming that Nievera assaulted him (No. 92-15290). The 25 plaintiffs, 1 members of seven Filipino families, cross-appeal the district court's denial of their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) (No. 92-15287). The plaintiffs claim that the defendants violated their substantive due process rights by…